Monday, February 2, 2009

REMINDER: One of The (many) Benefits of ASMP

UPDATE: In the interest of reminding you, I thought I'd repost this piece to remind you of the importance of making your voice heard. Here again are things worth considering.

When I have found fault with the goings-on of one of any one of the photo trade organizations, I have called them out on it, and that includes ASMP. I took a great deal of heat from the leadership of ASMP for my criticism of them for their handling of the orphan works issue, and if they take a similar stand during the next session of Congress, I will do so again. Yet, keep in mind, while I was critical about that, and also critical of ASMP's handling of the disclosure of their $1.3 million dollars and their mis-steps related to the Library of Congress grant for UPDIG, I continue to think well of the many other things that ASMP has done, and is doing.

A sidebar note to some of the readers of this blog - I realize that some of you want short, sweet, and concise missives on the varying discussing topics I write about. While this is not one of those cases where I can make the case and be short, if you don't want to continue reading, here it is in short (as of the graphic above wasn't clear enough) - I encourage you to OPPOSE the proposed change to the bylaws that you will be asked to vote on in the next few weeks.
Organizations exist for many reasons, and one of the things that ASMP has done extensively, for longer than I have been a photographer, has been the promotion of monthly programming - educational, inspiring, and insightful. Having served on the local board of the ASMP chapter here in DC for several tumultuous years, I can tell you that it's not easy, or cheap, to program the chapter each year, which is something that starts each July. "Can we afford it?" "Do we have to pay for his hotel?" "Will an admission fee that high turn off potential attendees?" These were all questions we grappled with. We were always excited when we could get a Canon Explorer of Light, because Canon footed the entire bill (Nikon does not have a similar program), and it was always a home-run of a program, but that paradigm of programming wasn't something that would fill 8 or 9 meetings.

When the invitation came to me to be one of the national traveling speakers for ASMP's Strictly Business 2 series that ran at the beginning of this year, I was humbled and honored. When I was asked how much I might charge to participate, I said I'd volunteer to do it, because the original one was so inspirational, and I didn't want any speaking fees to get in the way of getting the message out, and I was not alone in my sentiments - other presenters expressed a similar sentiment. Yet, ASMP countered "there's a lot of planning and time commitments for this, and we can't pay you what you really should be paid, but we can pay you something, as we are getting sponsorships for this." I said I'd take whatever they decided was fair, and it was fair, and boy were they right when they said there would be a lot of planning and time commitments seperate from the time actually giving the presentations. Multiple trips to Philadelphia, and a trip to Los Angeles were among the travel necessary before we gave the first SB2 presentation. A thorough review of my time spent away from DC doing ASMP work just for SB2 quantifiably cost me over $11,400 in lost assignments, net after factoring in the revenue from the speakers fees for each city. I didn't object - I had earned exponentially more than that since SB1 over 12 years prior, and I felt it karmically the right thing to do, and also something I've done for the NPPA, APA, and PPA too. And remember, I am not an ASMP board member, just a general member.

I am not complaining, I am quantifying this for you, in response to very serious criticism being put forth against the ASMP leadership, and the resulting referendum that has been proposed -- which will be be voted on by ASMP members. If passed, this referendum would revise the ASMP bylaws to forbid the organization from paying its' board members any amount - even a dime - for the time spent away from their business while traveling the country on behalf of ASMP, participating in ASMP programs (educational or otherwise). I whole-heartedly oppose the referendum and encourage you to vote against it.

For those of you who would like to know why, hit the jump.
(Continued after the Jump)

Times have changed. An email from a highly respected former past presdent of ASMP - Matt Herron that went out to members attempted to bolster the position held by Scott Highton - who is championing the effort to preclude ASMP leaders from being paid for giving presentations. Herron, whom has done many many excellent things for this industry that you will never know about but have benefited from, starts his piece "a little history", when writing in support of the payment preclusion, and therein lies the weakness of the position - Herron's position is rooted in history. Herron talks about his volunteerism as well as that of countless others recieving no compensation for their time. Times have changed and there are now sponsorship dollars to make these programs happen to such a degree that these programs could never have been put on before. The tradition of volunteerism that Herron speaks about when he suggests "Obviously in your mind at least, that tradition is now dead." Nothing could be further from the truth. Herron writes "I find it disturbing that so many Board members and ASMP officers are paid so much for activities that many of us freely gave for nothing in prior years." And again, Herron suggests that the past volunteer solution fits todays reality. It does not. Herron concludes - " I know that while some boards exercise sound judgment and ethical conduct, others do not." The boards minutes approve figures ""negotiated by ASMP's Executive Director", who is Eugene Mopsik. Thus, Mopsik is the person who ultimately offers, negotiates, and then approves these figures, not the board members.

Speakers fees for these programs are paid for, in full in almost all cases, by the organizations sponsoring the talks, whether it's Adbase, liveBooks, Microsoft, or any others. Further, the expense of getting the speakers to/from the various chapter cities are paid for by the admission fees each chapter charges. A review of ASMP-national-paid figures associated with one 40-city national tour for one speaker totaled $1,200 - for all 40 programs. The criticism comes in because these companies are paying ASMP, and then, in turn, that money is paid through to the speaker(s). While I could see that some might construe this as the appearance of a conflict of interest, I disagree, or, at-least I believe fully that it is not a conflict. It's far easier - and likely better from a tax/accounting standpoint - if these corporations make their payments in a lump sum to ASMP, and then ASMP administers that, and, in the event that a speaker has to be replaced, ASMP handles that, not the corporation. Further, ASMP leadership is not a place where people join to earn untold riches. In instances of some board members I know, they are losing revenue more than they are earning, yet they feel compelled, as have countless others before them, to give back, and the disbursement of monies to them for time spent is a fair and just thing to do.

The criticisms of board members, and past board members, fails to take into account that most of these programs were either proposed and approved prior to presenters becoming board members, or board members who are no longer board members, yet continue to give back by giving programs. This coming year, ASMP has a great slate of programs planned, and I believe they all are worth attending. If you're an ASMP member, and want to see how the board is handling this, the board also provides a page of payments to directors on the website to provide even more information above what is required, including dollars spent.

ASMP needs to continue to be able to produce a national programming series, and the preclusion of paying honorariums for the days it takes to travel to, speak in, and then travel back from the next day, one program, will make for slim pickings for talent to fill the needed shoes. When it comes to determining the ability and worth of speakers, ASMP leadership is highly discerning in that endeavor.

For example, despite my having given dozens of talks to many ASMP chapters around the county, NPPA presentations over many years, APA talks, and so on, with glowing attendee reviews in hand, neatly organized by event and made available to ASMP, I had to prove I could present, and I had my try-out at an APA talk in Chicago I gave two or so years ago. So, with SB2 having been a rousing success, I have all the faith in the world that those charged with programming and choosing speakers, are doing so with great thought and deliberation, and have earned the memberships' trust as good stewards of our best interests.

In one of the criticisms leveled at ASMP by Highton surrounds the payments to those travelling the country on behalf of ASMP for the highly beneficial "It's Your Business" series of programs. He cites a stipend of $1,000 and travel expenses bringing that number closer to $2,000. Since Herron (and likely Highton too) travelled for ASMP, and as Herron notes "We were paid travel expenses, and that was it", let's stick to the point about being paid $1,000. Highton, in an attempt to diminish the programming, refers to the presentations thusly - " These programs are 2-3 hours long each", as if these presenters are being paid that much for 2-3 hours.

As both Highton and Herron know and likely practice - they charge for travel time to and from assignments for driving and flying to offset their loss of assignment income during that time. In my case, if I have an assignment to cover an event in New York City for 3 hours, I will bill a 3-hour minimum of $600 ($200/hr), plus all my travel time at a 50% rate. So, 4 hours driving up, 4 hours driving back, is eight hours at $100/hr, plus mileage/tolls and so on. in a few weeks, I travel to the Boston area to give a non-ASMP presentation and to do so, I have to leave for the airport at around 10am to arrive by 3pm to give my evening presentation, and miss the last flight out, so I fly out in the morning, not getting home until late morning, or early afternoon. thus, two days of my revenue-generating abilities are lost. So too, these national presenters lose two days for each presentation they do. So, to suggest they are "earning" $1,000 for 2-3 hours is to exclude all of the travel time spent getting to and from these locations. It works out to about $500 a day, and these are top-tier photographers who would likely bill out at $1,500 to $2,500 for an assignment that would take a day, not to mention two days.

Another criticism was of Susan Carr, a past ASMP national president (who was kind enough to blurb my book for it's back cover following her tenure), and whom I worked closely with on the Strictly Business 2 national tour. Highton suggests Carr "coincidentally was hired recently as ASMP's part time education director." Actually, that's just plain false. Carr revealed that fact back in February or March during the closing forum at one of the SB2 stops to an assembled audience of several hundred. So, it's closer to a year ago, if not longer, that Susan decided to dial back her shooting schedule to commit her time to ASMP National on a part-time job basis. So too did Highton criticize Carr for being paid for the job of editing the latest edition of ASMP's Business Practices book. For the hundreds of hours of work she spent corralling authors, updating pieces from the previous editions, and shepherding the book through the entire process, and as someone who had three paid editors working with me on my book, that is a monumental task, and thus, payment to her - to anyone - is a no-brainer for me, and further, few people know that content as well as she does, so she was the perfect candidate to do it.

Now, we're not talking about local presentations here, but Highton lumps them all together as if they are the same - and they are not. Highton writes "Most other members who make presentations at chapter meetings do so willingly, at no cost. " Yes, that's true, and I do that too. When my book came out, not only did I do a free presentation to my DC chapter (to even have suggested my local chapter pay me is, on it's face, a ludicrous thought), I convinced my publisher to donate 50 copies of the book to the meeting. Then, I drove 2 hours to Richmond Virginia to make a presentation for the Central Virginia chapter, and I too would go to Baltimore to give a presentation there too, as a local chapter to me. Local volunteerism is a critical cornerstone of ASMP's viability, but that's not the same as getting on a plane to fly for 4+ hours in the air and doing it for free.

Highton closes one of his letters to the members "ASMP's very foundations of "photographers helping photographers" and working together as volunteers for our common good is at stake." Which is alarmist at best, but false at it's core. ASMP's foundation is about local activism and participation, and that will never change. As people evolve to the level of National Leadership, where it is required to travel several times a year on ASMP business, that commitment takes on an entirely higher level of commitment and time. Highton does the math on the interest generated from $1.3m sitting in the bank earning 5%, with a possible yield of $65k, as a way of diminishing the $85k that ASMP paid to the PLUS Coalition. Wouldn't it be nice if that money somehow could become an endowment with ASMP spending just the interest and thus allowing them to put on programs and presentations never done before? Increase the token compensation of the President? Offset lost assignment days by board members with token amounts?

So, it should be clear here that the well-intentioned efforts of Highton/Herron/et al are wreaking havoc on the organization, distracting ASMP leadership from pursuring the core mission of the organization, and from delivering maximum benefit to the members, at a time when ASMP members (and in fact, all photographers) need all that ASMP has to offer.

While the mechanism of a referendum is a valuable one, the issue of TOKEN payments to leaders and members for time dedicated to ASMP programs is (or should be) a non-issue. Lets not throw the baby out with the bath water.

Please post your comments by clicking the link below. If you've got questions, please pose them in our Photo Business Forum Flickr Group Discussion Threads.


dougplummer said...

I am so glad to see a cogent, reasoned statement against this referendum. I am really weary of Scott Highton's paranoid rantings. Would you consider sending an abridged version of this to the membership?

Anonymous said...

Of course speakers, governors, editors such as Susan should receive as much compensation as possible, lets not make Scott and Herron out to be raving lunatics. There has been a serious lack of transparency over many issues with the present board including the nepotism shown over a few minor exchanges of money for photo shoots. That is cronyism and shouldn't be tolerated. Now they know, got a slap on the wrist and hopefully they will do the right thing next time.
The world-wide financial debacle has proven the need for transparency and regulation. Bring it on and if something isn't broke - don't fix it. The spin is on and you're all making us crazy. The Board has the means to fix this and should do forthwith or sack the bloody lot. The best of ASMP is at stake and no one is laughing.

Anonymous said...

Thanks again John, for the time you spend on our behalf.

Integrity. Someone should clearly define what this word is and how photography could benefit from adopting it, then fire out an email and encourage the masses to do some real soul searching.

It's almost like common sense is unwelcome.

I often find myself wondering if the professionals, that find their way to the top in this industry, use to be related to rulers of third world countries from the 60's.

John, I'm going to beat the dead horse here so please endulge me one more time and then you will never hear it from me again.

Please consider using your considerable capacity, integrity and substance to create a photographer registery. Call it the United States Photographers Registery or whatever.

Set it up in a 5 class system by genre. Have a summit meeting and invite George, Moose, Bert, Darren, Allen, Peter, Robert, Vincent, Grover, Burf, Donald, Jack, Mark ASMP, PDN or anyone else for that matter you feel can be unbiased.

Class 5: Everyone with a camera is invited to belong to this class.

Class 4: The individual must show an interest in learning the basics of photography as an art form.

Class 3: The individual has studied his or her craft and is familiar with the business side of photography. They can make quality images on a consistant basis.

Class 2: They are professional photographers who have proven themselves.

Class 1: Here is where(much like the military, when you get to a certain rank you have to be politically accepted) You get accepted into the Class 1 rating by the best in the genre's business.

There are many ways to accomplish this and to have people move up the classes through a simple testing system already in use in other industries.

Once you get folks to be responsible and declare their interests by genre and support you and your efforts to bring transparency through out the system I think it would be a good initial step for us all.

It wouldn't work without integrity though.

That is the short version.

Anonymous said...

Hi John,

Paying members who speak nationally for their organisation is a good thing. Naturally you want the those who are the best at what they do to speak. A small payment helps offset some of the loss of business. If organisations can agree on a set rate then everyone, the speakers and members, know who gets what. A speakers agreement makes a level playing field with full disclosure.

The ASMP is recognised as the leader in educating photographers. The value of education from ASMP speakers must not be under-valued. Photo colleges simply cannot keep up with this rapidly changing profession. By the time the curiculum is updated it is out of date.

And I'm not talking about workflow here. There are many photographers happy to take your money to for workshops in the latest software, etc.

What the ASMP has that these other workshops do not is teaching best business practise. The fact that successful photographers are happy to share their business success always amazes me.

-- Robert.

Anonymous said...

My time as a chapter president showed me that the national organization has been riding on the good reputation the ASMP developed during the 60's, 70's and 80's. None of the top level leaders in the industry are on the current board. The current board and its president have made many missteps. There is no current code of ethics (source: Vic Perlman). The board is older than the typical working photographer and has not kept up with the web driven side of the business. The business mantra they deliver seems out of touch with current markets.

Their basic message is: Don't sell all rights. License your work rather than selling it outright, etc.

Scott Highton rightly points out that much of what the current board has done is opaque. There is a decided tilt toward supporting the national headquarters at the expense of local chapters.

What is needed is a total re-energizing of the Society. We need to eliminate tenure for paid staff. (I know it does not exist contractually but does practically) and we need to focus on growing and supporting local programs because that is where the rubber hits the road.

John has a vested emotional interest in supporting the organization as they have appealed to his ego and his sense of all the good the ASMP did in the past.

Their recent handling of the OWC hurt the organization in almost everyone's eyes. The debacle with the 1.3 million bucks was a nail in the coffin.

My take now is that the current board is circling the wagons in an attempt to hold on to power and to stay relevant in a market they truly do not understand.

Funny that we are currently getting one or two e-mails a week about the "benefits" of membership that really amount to a small discount to try the services of one or another start up companies.

I wonder if the APA or even the PPofA offer more real value for their members dollars.

The time of the restrictive trade union (excuse me, associations) seems to be coming to an end as I find it is the fellow ASMP'ers who are the first to lowball bids and estimates.

The loyalty in and of itself speaks to a powerful historic legacy. The action on the ground says otherwise.

Anonymous said...

I came into photography after practicing architecture for 30 years and was fortunate enough to stumble upon ASMP soon enough to avoid a world of misery and fumbling around in the dark.

I've never been in an organization whose members are as passionate, and I find the whole "Highton affair" amazing, amusing, bemusing and frustrating. Clearly this is a difficult time to be a practicing professional photographer. If we, however, take out our fears and frustrations on a few dedicated people who are willing to spend hours upon hours of their time on the administrutia of the organization, and on membership education, well.... there's not much hope.

I have agreed to serve on my local chapter board as a way of giving back. If you disagree with the current policies of the organization and want to see changes, I suggest you do the same.

And one more thing....

If you won't sign your name to a post, don't bother to send it.

John Harrington said...

2/2 Anonymous:
You wrote:
>>>The board is older than the typical working photographer and has not kept up with the web driven side of the business.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

>>> The business mantra they deliver seems out of touch with current markets.

The business messaging (that I was a part of in SB2) is one that will allow you to survive. It is, by no means, out of touch with current markets!

>>>John has a vested emotional interest in supporting the organization as they have appealed to his ego and his sense of all the good the ASMP did in the past.

What ASMP is doing now is quantifiably greater in frequency and density of content than what they did when I was starting out, and yes, I feel they did me a great service with information back then, so the information now is much more robust and informative. However, to suggest that my ego is a factor is sorely mistaken. ASMP has taken hits from me on other issues (Orphan Works among them), and they're likely not positively disposed to be saying nice things about me to appeal to my ego.

-- John

Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

converse shoes
wedding dresses
wholesale polo shirts
brand clothingcheap clothing
clothes sportspolos shirtair shoes

Anonymous said...

cheap polos
polo shirts
ralph lauren polo shirtssport shoes
ugg boots
puma shoes
chaussures pumamp4
trade chinalacoste polo shirts
chaussure puma femmewedding dressestennis racket

Anonymous said...

nike tnEnter the necessary language
translation, up to 200 bytes winter, moves frequently in Chinanike chaussures showing that the deep strategy of the Chinese market. Harvard Business School, tn chaussures according to the relevant survey data show that in recent years the Chinese market three brands, Adidas, Li Ning market share at 21 percent, respectively,

Anonymous said...

mens clothing men's sweate, cheap columbia jackets, lacoste sweater, ralph lauren polo shirts,ski clothing. Free Shipping, PayPal Payment. Enjoy your shopping experience on

Anonymous said...

Puma shoes , Ugg Boots , nike max shoes, NIKE AIR MAX TN ,nike max shoes ,PUMA CHAUSSURES, NIKE SHOX Torch ,puma Ferrari F1 ,PUMA DRIFT CATmens clothing men's sweate, cheap columbia jackets, lacoste sweater, ralph lauren polo shirts,ski clothing. Free Shipping, PayPal Payment. Enjoy your shopping experience on mensclothingstore.Us

Newer Post Older Post