Moms With Cameras - Revisited
One of the many problems for photographers is how those who couldn't care less about the business of photography do damage to the business of photography. Often, these are people who have other jobs that pay the bills, and they look to photo credit to give them pleasure, acclaim, and notoriety, getting their satisfaction at the expense -- literally -- of those who earn a living making pictures. Many times, these are "moms with cameras", or MWCs. What I'd like to highlight today is something different. It's a MWC who is endeavoring to do things right.
She is writing a blog, titled "Hey Girl, Nice Shot - It takes more than a camera to go pro." She's got several posts I'd like to highlight, and encourage you to read. They are:
Please post your comments by clicking the link below. If you've got questions, please pose them in our Photo Business Forum Flickr Group Discussion Threads.
5 comments:
Thanks for pointing out this nice blog I probably wouldn't have found otherwise...
I'd say this person is much more than just a "Mom With Camera". She's (at least) an enterprising MWC who is clearly running a business and therefore expects much more than a photo credit to justify her work. Hence, she does the "right things" as you say.
People who have other jobs, couldn't care less about the business of photography, and require only photo credits and personal satisfaction in return for their work are called Hobbyists. Surely you're not suggesting that hobbyists are getting the best of working professionals, or that hobbyists should conform to standard business practices or even that hobbyists should stop practicing their hobby. Are you?
If someone has made a choice in life to attempt to make a living from something that millions of people enjoy as a hobby, then they better be darn good at it and be able to clearly show clients why they should be willing to pay what they consider to be a "living wage".
I don't think the problem is with Moms With Cameras or Dads With Cameras or Guys/Gals With Cameras or whatever else you want to call them. The problem is with the sense of entitlement held by so-called "professionals".
John,
I don't want you to take this negatively, I've followed your blog for quite some time and think it is of vast help for a professional photographer trying to make it freelance.
But, here's where I'm going to have to agree with Paul (previous poster). Amateurs are out there, and as cameras continue to improve and get mass distribution (I just read statistics on how many millions of 8+MP cameras had been sold and were expected to be sold, I'm sure you also saw them) there are only going to be more. There's nothing we can do at this point to turn it back, the hole in the damn is just too big for our thumbs.
Does this mean it's going to kill a lot of areas of stock photography? Yes. Do I think it's going to badly damage a lot of areas of freelance photojournalism in the US? yes. Do I think it'll have an even greater impact on wedding and portrait photography? Yes (and since I shoot those I know somewhat first hand, and I've had people come to me lamenting that their cousin's uncle was the only one there with a point and shoot camera he didn't know how to work and the wedding as outside at noon with no clouds).
New technology and ways of doing things have always taken a toll on users of previous technology. The printing press on scribes, the mechanical typing on the printing press, the word processor on the typewriter (I realize not all of those examples fully apply but am going to go with less detail for the sake of space.)
All of this means that the pool of professional photographers will shrink, which is sad. But, a company can't guarantee that an unpaid amateur will get the shot, or even a less qualified professional. I believe even you had an entry where you were underbid for a shoot you do each year, only to be called after the fact because _you_are_reliable_. Your photos are good, I won't deny that, but there are thousands of people out there, amateurs and professionals, who take photos just as good. You do well because a company can come to you and know that you are worth every penny you charge, because you get the shots they need.
The photographers who survive all of this won't be the ones who banded together on price, or rights packages, or even on work made for hire. They will be the photographers who have the reliability and creativity to get what the client needs.
Those business practices are what set you apart from a lot, and your blog is at its best when you are touching on them.
I don't see anything special there. A mom with camera with some equipment and a pro association membership. Nothing wrong with that, but as to your statement "It's a MWC who is endeavoring to do things right.", I don't particularly see anything "right" over anyone else doing the same.
花蓮入口網|花蓮|花蓮民宿|花蓮民宿訂房諮詢服務|花蓮美食|花蓮民宿|花蓮旅遊|花蓮|花蓮電影|花蓮|花蓮民宿|花蓮海洋公園|花蓮縣長|花蓮遠來飯店|花蓮提拉米蘇|花蓮客運|蜂蜜|花蓮太魯閣|花蓮廣告|花蓮地圖|花蓮旅遊|花蓮民宿|花蓮房屋|花蓮民宿|花蓮汽車|花蓮餐廳|花蓮旅館|花蓮瑞穗牧場|花蓮名產|花蓮民宿|花蓮租屋|花蓮理想大地|花蓮民宿|花蓮廣告|花蓮黃頁 網路電話簿|花蓮民宿|花蓮計程車|花蓮餐廳|花蓮租車旅遊網|花蓮入口網 IN HUALIEN 吃喝玩樂樣樣通|花蓮旅遊|花蓮|花蓮|花蓮|花蓮|花蓮|花蓮
Post a Comment