tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7553278593406733377.post1578905473527805084..comments2024-03-20T00:37:30.189-04:00Comments on Photo Business News & Forum: Just Desserts (Or, you Get What You Pay For)John Harringtonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16941161605443479300noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7553278593406733377.post-63066293772914507092007-04-15T16:58:00.000-04:002007-04-15T16:58:00.000-04:00Michael Evans, was the photographer. The point on ...Michael Evans, was the photographer. The point on this is detracting from the point of the article, that is the duplicity images have for different products when the rights are not managed. That is what we need to show/share whne nego. rates. I have ripped both examples off as prints into my portfolio to demonstrate the drawbacks for RF images.<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>But to Evans, I say Hooraah that his image had the strength through time to be chosen twice for a cover at the same time. That says more to the powere/impact a photographer can have. As to the biz side, someone correct me if I am wrong, but he made 40K or so per cover with this shot? <BR/><BR/>Bob Roberts<BR/>SF, CAAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7553278593406733377.post-53067418891585059342007-04-15T04:20:00.000-04:002007-04-15T04:20:00.000-04:00Did not the photographer of Reagan retain his righ...Did not the photographer of Reagan retain his rights and make out like a bandit on these covers? Was it not the Photographer who helped sell these shots???Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7553278593406733377.post-78773586797969645572007-04-13T23:16:00.000-04:002007-04-13T23:16:00.000-04:00Ahhh, just another case of someone using microstoc...Ahhh, just another case of someone using microstock and screwing the pooch...David Hobbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13303290880581288834noreply@blogger.com